Measuring Missional Movement, Part Two
Philosphy of Church Multiplication | July 2, 2008 No Comments »This post was previously written by Steve Pike on April 10th. Since Steve is out of town, we will be revisiting some classic posts and updating previous church planter stories over the next couple of weeks.
**********************************************
So, in our last post we wondered about whether our old faithful gauge of missional progress is really all that meaningful. What does it really mean when seats are filled or unoccupied on Sunday morning? It is certainly more fun to preach to a full house than to an empty room. And I don’t mean to downplay the fact that God does use the foolishness of preaching to confound the wise. People do make life changing decisions as a result of being present when the anointed Word is communicated with passion and integrity. Please don’t misinterpret what I’m trying to say. Sermons are good. People listening and responding to sermons is good. But, is that all there is? And again, I must ask, how much can we learn about the spiritual vitality of a group of people assembled in a church meeting on a Sunday morning? Is the person there because they are seeking God? Are they there because they are trying to please their spouse or a friend? Are they there because they hope to make a business contact? Are they there because that’s what they always do and they would feel guilty if they weren’t there? Are they there just to see the spectacle of a preacher living on the roof and hoping their their presence in a room will convince him to come down? (see part one of MMM) And what impact might their reason for being there have on how much benefit they receive from the experience? So, are head counts a reliable gauge of spiritual formation? Read the rest of this entry »